loader image

India’s final amended tax residency rules for Citizens and Indian origin individuals based overseas

This note is in continuation to our earlier note of February 2020 which discussed the proposals of the Finance Bill, 2020 (‘the Bill’) to amend the tax residency conditions for non-resident Indians and persons of Indian origin1 with effect from 1 April 2020 (i.e. Financial Year 2020-21 onwards2).

In substance, the proposals aimed to reduce the flexibility of stay currently given to such individuals in the determination of their tax residency status and bring within the tax net Indian citizens that are not tax resident in any country. If such a person was to become an ordinary resident under the proposed amendments, not only would such person be liable to tax in India on global income but also be required to report all foreign assets in the tax return. The nature of the proposals brought into the focus the potential importance of the ‘tie-break’ rule under a tax treaty of India with the country of such person’s residence. The note is attached once again for your easy reference.

Subsequent to the introduction of the Bill, concerns were raised by various stakeholders that the language of the proposed amendments could negatively impact cases of such persons genuinely employed / working / living outside India. To address this, the Government of India issued a press release stating that income earned outside India by such Indian citizens who are bona-fide based outside India shall not be taxed in India unless it is derived from an Indian business or profession.

Given this background, suitable modifications were expected to be made to the proposed amendments at the time of passing of the Bill. As expected, at the time of enacting the Finance Act, 2020 (‘the Act’), the following modifications have been made:

Nature of personOriginal proposal as per the Bill


Enacted provision of the Act
An Indian citizen or a Person of Indian origin (PIO) based outside India and visiting IndiaWould be considered as an Indian resident if:


·     stay in India was for 120 days or more in that financial year; and

·       aggregate stay in India in the preceding 4 years was 365 days or more.



Would be considered as an Indian resident if:

·  stay in India was for 120 days or more in that financial year;


·  total income (excluding income from foreign source3) exceeds INR 1.5mn in the given financial year; and

·  aggregate stay in India in the preceding 4 years was 365 days or more.


Accordingly, only persons exceeding the above mentioned income threshold would now be subject to the lower threshold of stay of 120 days. For others, the existing threshold of stay of 182 days continues to apply.
An Indian citizen who is not liable to tax in any other country or territoryDeemed to be a resident in India, irrespective of his period of stay in India in the said financial year.Deemed to be a resident only if the total income of such citizen (excluding income from foreign source3) exceeds INR 1.5mn.


Nature of person


Original proposal as per the BillEnacted provision of the Act
by reason of his domicile or residence or any other criteria of similar nature (i.e. Stateless Indian Citizen)
Individual treated as “not ordinarily resident” (NOR)Will be treated as NOR if such individual is non-resident in India in 7 out of the 10 preceding financial years.
In other words, an individual will be treated as ordinary resident only if considered resident in 4 out of 10 preceding years.
The proposed amendment has been dropped. Accordingly, the existing conditions of NOR will continue i.e. for being a NOR such person should be:

·    non-resident in 9 out of 10 preceding years or

·    stay in India should be of 729 days or less during the preceding 7 years.


However, the definition of NOR has now been expanded to include:

·       Individual considered as Indian resident due to the amended new threshold of 120 days, provided stay in India is less than 182 days;

·       A stateless Indian citizen considered as Indian resident due to the above amended new provisions.


The amendments enacted by the Act seeks to address the concerns raised by stakeholders. However, while the threshold of INR 1.5mn for non foreign source income should reduce the applicability of the amendments to many such persons (herein after referred to as “NRIs”4 for sake of brevity), NRIs with high net-worth (HN) may need to further analyse the applicability of these provisions as they are likely to have Indian sourced income exceeding INR 1.5mn annually.

HN NRIs falling in the category of stateless Indian Citizens may consider arguing that while their countries of residence do not actually levy tax, they continue to remain liable to tax in those countries as and when the need arises. This argument should be backed by a tax residency certificate (TRC) issued by the authorities of such NRI’s country of residence. Other HN NRIs who may get covered by the lower threshold of 120 days of stay in India need to carefully monitor the days of stay in India. The use of ‘tie break’ test under an applicable Indian tax treaty should also enable both sets of NRIs to argue that they ultimately are non-residents in India. To access the tax treaty, TRC would be a must. The features of the tie-break rule were already discussed in our earlier note.

Having said the above, one of the key takeaways from the amendments made by the Act are that even if such NRIs are treated or deemed ‘resident’ in India, they will be categorised as NOR only. The following table explains the difference arising from the categorisation of residency of such NRIs:

Liable to tax in India on global incomeLiable to tax in India only on India-sourced income and income which arises from a business or profession controlled or setup in IndiaLiable to tax in India only on India-sourced income
Required to disclose all foreign assets in Indian tax returnNot required to disclose all foreign assets in Indian tax returnNot required to disclose all foreign assets in Indian tax return


From the table, it can be observed that NOR NRIs will not be liable to tax on their global income in India. Further, they will not be required to disclose foreign assets in their Indian tax returns.

In essence, the only difference between a NOR and a non-resident NRI will be that in addition to India-sourced income, a NOR will be liable to also pay tax in India on income which arises from a business or profession controlled or setup in India. Practically, such income would most likely already be covered in the definition of India-sourced income and hence, no material impact may arise.

Nevertheless, the term “income derived from a business controlled in or a profession set up in India” is now of two-fold significance i.e.

  • for determine scope of total taxable income; and
  • determining the threshold of INR 1.5mn for the new stricter residency rules.

Accordingly, it is hoped that tax authorities provide suitable clarifications on the meaning of this term to enable concerned NRIs to understand the exact scope and nature of income to be considered while computing the threshold of INR 1.5mn. This should provide greater certainty to NRIs and significantly reduce the possibility of litigation with tax authorities.

On a parting note, it may be mentioned that if the case of any such NRI does get selected for scrutiny by the Indian tax authorities (which is routine in India), an intense and invasive scrutiny of such NRI’s personal matters cannot be ruled out. For instance, the tax authorities may:

  • undertake verification of the passport to determine number of days of stay in India,
  • understand and verify the nature of activities in India and overseas,
  • ask for details of total wealth, businesses, income etc. and their bifurcation between India and overseas5,
  • ask for composition of family, their location, businesses, etc.

Further, if the NRI is relying on a tie-break rule, possibility of litigation with Indian tax authorities on account of any contrary interpretation also cannot be ruled out.

In conclusion, HN NRIs need to carefully assess their residential status in India from 1 April 2020 onwards and analyse the impact on their liability towards Indian taxes arising from the amendments enacted by the Act.

For any further information, please feel free to reach out to Sakate Khaitan, Senior Partner at [email protected] or Abbas Jaorawala, Consultant at [email protected].


  1. A person who is of Indian origin but citizen of another country.
    2. Financial Year in India is for the period April to March.
    3. Income from foreign sources has been explained to mean income which accrues or arises outside India but does not include income derived from a business controlled in or a profession set up in India.
    4. NRI is a popular term loosely used for non-resident Indian citizens or persons of Indian origin.
    5. The tax authorities may seek this information to expand the scope of taxable income in India. However, it may be possible to argue that as an RNOR, the NRI is not required to provide details of foreign assets and income to Indian tax authorities.

Sakate Khaitan

Senior Partner

Abbas Jaorawala

Senior Director and Head – Direct Tax
[email-subscribers-form id="1"]
This page contains general information regarding Khaitan Legal Associates and is not intended as a solicitation or an advertisement of its services or any invitation or inducement of any sort. Nothing contained in this website constitutes legal advice or creation of a lawyer-client relationship. If you have any issues, you must seek legal advice. Khaitan Legal Associates is not liable for the consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.